How is physics related to science?
News from God's Particle "was the headline of the" Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung "in June 2014 after the research center CERN had again published new data from elementary particle physics.  Scientists often reject the term“ God's Particle ”for popular scientific presentations However, it seems appropriate, this image of a science that seeks and finds God.This image actually does not correspond to the dominant discourse and thus at the same time makes clear the complexity and ambiguity that are connected with the relationship between science and religion.
Dr. phil, born 1971; Employee in the research group science policy and project manager on the subject of science and religion at the Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin. [email protected]
In general, in Germany and elsewhere, there is great agreement that science and religion are based on two substantially different worldviews: religion is based on belief, irrationality and insecurity, science on knowledge, rationality and reliable evidence. In an interview, a stem cell researcher summed up the relationship between science and religion in a nutshell: "As a scientist, you can't believe in everything the church tells you."  Agreement on these separate worlds is in Germany is so big that it is rarely discussed in public - in contrast to the Anglo-Saxon countries, for example. There the dispute between so-called evolutionists (defenders of the biological theory of evolution to explain the origin of the world) and so-called creationists (defenders of the Christian doctrine of creation to explain the origin of the world) has many facets and is being carried out with broad public attention.
Be it by mutual agreement or in open conflict: science and religion seem to be based on two irreconcilable or at least conflicting worldviews. Where does this clear assessment come from and what is to be made of it? I dedicate myself to this question first historically, then conceptually and finally with a view to current empirical examples.
Conflict narrativesOne of the most prominent narrators on the conflict between science and religion was certainly the French philosopher Auguste Comte (1798–1857), who was often referred to as the founding father of sociology. According to his "law of three stages", individuals and humanity as a whole go through a progressive development from the theological through the metaphysical to the positive stage. Instead of assuming metaphysical causes for the (initially) inexplicable, for the positive scientific method "its scientific effectiveness (...) always emerges exclusively from its direct or indirect correspondence with the observed phenomena".  It is only in the positive stage that "a completely normal state of mind is brought about". 
Comte's philosophy is at the same time a political program. His "Speech on the Spirit of Positivism" contains the racism customary at the time, when he explains which of the "three great races" persisted in which stage.  His programmatic goal is to bring the world into the positive stage: conventional religion is to be replaced by positive science. In the later phase of his work he then describes positivism itself as the "religion of humanity"; So-called temples of humanity are being built in several countries, and Comte presents himself as the founder of a secular religion. 
The path to this secular religion was not followed by all supporters of positivism. In terms of content, however, the mission was extremely successful: Anyone who wanted to be taken seriously in science from now on had to orientate themselves on positivist premises - and clearly distinguish themselves from religious beliefs. The conflict between science and religion has become a continuum in the history of science. In 1873 the philosopher and natural scientist John William Draper published his widely acclaimed work "History of the Conflict between Religion and Science" with the core thesis that science and religion inevitably have to be in conflict with one another, because "(...) faith is in its nature unchangeable, stationary; Science is in its nature progressive ".  So whoever is for progress cannot be for religion. This conviction, for example, even during the founding phase of American sociology at the beginning of the 20th century, led to religiously motivated sociologists being actively excluded from the professional community in order not to jeopardize the establishment as a serious discipline. 
Historically, the conflict narratives have been called into question in many ways. In particular, the interpretations of the so-called scientific revolution have changed - the period from around 1500 to 1700, the authors like the quoted Draper as the epitome of the triumph of modern science over religion. More recent historical research highlights how complex the interactions between science and religion were, both institutionally and for the individual scientist. A look inside the institutions shows, for example, that Galileo Galilei also had advocates and admirers within the Catholic Church, not least Cardinal Maffeo Barberini and later Pope Urban VIII himself.  Great scientists of the time such as Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton carried out their scientific work explicitly out of the religious motivation to prove the existence of God by researching causes and interdependencies. 
The circumstances were therefore more complex than many historians would have initially assumed, even in the euphoria of the rising positivism. But where are we today? Obviously, Comte was wrong with his thesis that science should replace religion. Everyday observations as well as numerous studies show that the importance of religion continues to be great in modern societies. However, this also applies to science - it is often described as the decisive engine of growth in modern "knowledge societies". So neither one nor the other was replaced. But what does that mean? What exactly is there actually with religion on the one hand and science on the other?
- How wide is an average airplane seat
- When do the muscles grow after exercise
- How do i become a romantic man
- Facial scars can be removed
- What the singer of the 60s after Paul McCartney sounded
- What is more important ability or will
- Cell lysis is a normal physiological process
- Which religion corresponds to the signs of the zodiac
- What is a Siamese cat breeder
- Is haram weaving in Islam
- Which automakers still build V12 engines?
- What is CCE and NCF
- What do we call a cell phone
- Can you drink in public in Spain?
- What are the professions of Rohit Sharma
- Epistemological nihilism seems logical to atheists
- Is protista multicellular or unicellular
- How do I request a return
- What does unsupported video format mean
- What's the coolest monkey
- Countries where investing can give you citizenship
- Cryotherapy helps with eczema
- Must invest math
- How much does an ITIL instructor earn
- How to tell the truth in Indonesian
- Why molecules gain kinetic energy when heated
- What if antioxidants are fat soluble?
- Thunder is lightning
- How does the Curiosity Rover get power
- Lack of suffering inhibits spiritual growth
- Can I take omeprazole every other day
- Why do we need an industrial revolution