Who was the first DG of the NCC

Quantitative perfusion imaging in magnetic resonance imaging

  • 1.

    Ai T, Morelli JN, Hu X et al (2012) A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations. Invest Radiol 47: 725-741

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X et al (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the european consortium for aSL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73: 102-116

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Bjornerud A, Sorensen AG, Mouridsen K et al (2011) T1- and T2 * -dominant extravasation correction in DSC-MRI: part I - theoretical considerations and implications for assessment of tumor hemodynamic properties. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31: 2041-2053

    PubMed CentralArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Bolar DS, Levin DL, Hopkins SR et al (2006) Quantification of regional pulmonary blood flow using ASL-FAIRER. Magn Reson Med 55: 1308-1317

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC et al (1998) A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 40: 383-396

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Calamante F (2013) Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 74: 1-32

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Cutajar M, Thomas DL, Hales PW et al (2014) Comparison of ASL and DCE MRI for the non-invasive measurement of renal blood flow: quantification and reproducibility. Eur Radiol 24: 1300-1308

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Dai W, Garcia D, Bazelaire CD et al (2008) Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 60: 1488-1497

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Davenport MS, Heye T, Dale BM et al (2013) Inter-and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model. J Magn Reson Imaging 38: 329-335

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Davids M, Zollner FG, Ruttorf M et al (2014) Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 32: 771-780

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS et al (1992) Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 23: 37-45

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Detre JA, Rao H, Wang DJJ et al (2012) Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 35: 1026-1037

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Dujardin M, Sourbron S, Luypaert R et al (2005) Quantification of renal perfusion and function on a voxel-by-voxel basis: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 54: 841-849

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Emblem KE, Due-Tonnessen P, Hald JK et al (2014) Machine learning in preoperative glioma MRI: survival associations by perfusion-based support vector machine outperforms traditional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 40: 47-54

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 15.

    European Society Of R (2015) ESR position paper on imaging Biobanks. Insights Imaging 6: 403-410

    Article Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW et al (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 241: 449-458

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Günther M, Bock M, Schad LR (2001) Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: Inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn Reson Med 46: 974-984

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Gunther M, Oshio K, Feinberg DA (2005) Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 54: 491-498

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Hahn OM, Yang C, Medved M et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging pharmacodynamic biomarker study of sorafenib in metastatic renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26: 4572-4578

    PubMed CentralArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Heusch P, Wittsack HJ, Blondin D, Ljimani A, Nguyen-Quang M, Martirosian P, Zenginli H, Bilk P, Kröpil P, Heusner TA, Antoch G, Lanzman RS (2014) Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys using arterial spin labeling MRI . J Magn Reson Imaging 40 (1): 84-89

  • 21.

    Heye T, Davenport MS, Horvath JJ et al (2013) Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions. Radiology 266: 801-811

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Ishimori Y, Kimura H, Matsuda T et al (2003) Dynamic contrast-enhanced T (1) measuring MRI using variable flip angle SPGR. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 59: 1535-1541

    PubMed Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Kim SG (1995) Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 34: 293-301

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D et al (2006) Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast 15: 29-38

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA et al (1992) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 5675-5679

    PubMed CentralArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Lanzman RS, Robson PM, Sun MR et al (2012) Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology 265: 799-808

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Lietzmann F, Zöllner FG, Attenberger UI et al (2012) DCE-MRI of the human kidney using BLADE: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 35: 868-874

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA et al (1999) QUIPSS II with thin-slice TI1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 41: 1246-1254

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Macintosh BJ, Filippini N, Chappell MA et al (2010) Assessment of arterial arrival times derived from multiple inversion time pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn Reson Med 63: 641-647

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Martirosian P, Boss A, Schraml C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging without contrast media. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37 (Suppl 1): 52-64

    Article Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Martirosian P, Klose U, Mader I et al (2004) FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med 51: 353-361

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Mcdonald JS, Mcdonald RJ, Comin J et al (2013) Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267: 119-128

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Meier P, Zierler KL (1954) On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 6: 731-744

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Mendichovszky IA, Cutajar M, Gordon I (2009) Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Eur J Radiol 71: 576-581

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Merrem AD, Zollner FG, Reich M et al (2013) A variational approach to image registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the human kidney. Magn Reson Imaging 31: 771-777

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Michaely HJ, Thomsen HS, Reiser MF et al (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) - implications for radiology. Radiologist 47: 785-793

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Norman JT, Stidwill R, Singer M et al (2003) Angiotensin II blockade augments renal cortical microvascular pO2 indicating a novel, potentially renoprotective action. Nephron Physiol 94: p39-46

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Notohamiprodjo M, Sourbron S, Staehler M et al (2010) Measuring perfusion and permeability in renal cell carcinoma with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. J Magn Reson Imaging 31: 490-501

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 39.

    O’Connor JP, Jackson A, Asselin MC et al (2008) Quantitative imaging biomarkers in the clinical development of targeted therapeutics: current and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol 9: 766-776

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 40.

    O’Connor JP, Tofts PS, Miles KA et al (2011) Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI. Br J Radiol 84 (Spec No 2): 112-120

    Article Google Scholar

  • 41.

    Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M et al (2008) Dynamic perfusion MRI: capability for evaluation of disease severity and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with connective tissue disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 28: 887-899

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Ostergaard L (2005) Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 22: 710-717

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Pallwein-Prettner L, Flory D, Rotter CR et al (2011) Assessment and characterization of common renal masses with CT and MRI. Insights Imaging 2: 543-556

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 44.

    Park S-H, Wang DJJ, Duong TQ (2013) Balanced steady state free precession for arterial spin labeling MRI: Initial experience for blood flow mapping in human brain, retina, and kidney. Magn Reson Imaging 31: 1044-1050

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Petersen ET, Mouridsen K, Golay X (2010) The QUaSaR reproducibility study, part II: results from a multi-center arterial spin labeling test - retest study. Neuroimage 49: 104-113

    PubMed CentralArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (2015) Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. (In: RSNA) http://www.rsna.org/QIBA.aspx. Accessed July 01, 2015

    Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Rischke HC, Schafer AO, Nestle U et al (2012) Detection of local recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in terms of salvage radiotherapy using dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI without endorectal coil. Radiate Oncol 7: 185

    PubMed CentralArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Roberts DA, Rizi R, Lenkinski RE et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: Blood partition coefficient for water: Application to spin-tagging measurement of perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 6: 363-366

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 49.

    Rosen MA, Schnall MD (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for assessing tumor vascularity and vascular effects of targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13: 770s-776s

    ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar

  • 50.

    Rossi C, Boss A, Artunc F et al (2009) Comprehensive assessment of renal function and vessel morphology in potential living kidney donors: an MRI-based approach. Invest Radiol 44: 705-711

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 51.

    Runge VM, Aoki S, Bradley WG Jr et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed Tomography of the brain-50 years of innovation, with a focus on the future. Invest Radiol 50: 551-556

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 52.

    Sertdemir M, Schoenberg SO, Sourbron S et al (2013) Interscanner comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: 1.5 versus 3 T MRI. Invest Radiol 48: 92-97

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • 53.

    Sorensen AG (2008) Perfusion MR imaging: moving forward. Radiology 249: 416-417