Is it illegal to support the UK Parliament?
UK Parliament forced break illegal
London. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's forced break in parliament has been declared "illegal" by the country's Supreme Court. The House of Commons should come together "as soon as possible," the court ruled in London on Tuesday. Leading MEPs have welcomed the London ruling against the UK Parliament's forced break. Labor opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn called for Johnson to resign after the verdict.
The Brexit Commissioner in the EU Parliament Guy Verhofstadt commented: “In a real democracy, parliaments should never be silenced. I never want to hear again Boris Johnson or any other Brexit supporter saying that the European Union is undemocratic. "
David McAllister, head of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the European Parliament, also saw the British court decision as a defeat for Johnson and a strengthening of parliamentarism. But the CDU politician warned: »Today's decision does not solve the original political blockade. It is now a matter of getting back to the factual debate quickly. We must succeed in averting a disorderly exit of the United Kingdom from the EU. "
There had been two complaints against the nearly five-week adjournment of parliament recommended by Johnson for Queen Elizabeth II, one of which had been brought by several MPs. The Supreme Court has now concluded that Johnson's decision "to advise Her Majesty to adjourn Parliament was illegal," said Court President Brenda Hale. The compulsory break is thus "invalid and ineffective". MEPs could take "immediate steps" for a parliamentary meeting.
House Speaker John Bercow said after the verdict was pronounced that Parliament must now "meet without delay." Bercow announced immediate talks with the party leaders.
At the Labor party conference in Brigthon Johnson, Corbyn called on Johnson to allow early elections with a resignation. A government that "respects democracy" should emerge from the new elections.
Johnson's decision to give Parliament an almost five-week break from session shortly before Britain's exit from the EU, scheduled for October 31, had sparked protests across the country. Critics accuse the conservative head of government of wanting to overturn parliament at the crucial Brexit time of all times, in order to be able to enforce an exit without an agreement with the EU if necessary. The majority of MPs reject a no-deal Brexit.
Johnson's lawyers, on the other hand, stayed in court with the statement that it had been a routine process and that the government only wanted time to prepare the new government program through the forced break. Agencies / nd
nd journalism from the left thrives on the commitment of its readers
In view of the experience of the corona pandemic, we have decided to make our journalism permanently freely accessible on our website and thus make it available to everyone who is interested.
As with our print and epaper editions, our work as an author, editor, technician or publishing employee is part of every published article. It is what makes this journalism possible.
Volunteer now with just a few clicks!
- What is meant by color space photography
- What is SAP NetWeaver
- What happens to elves when they die?
- When does the sun become a red dwarf?
- Is there something wrong with torturing insects?
- Why is ISIS beheading Muslims
- Who came along with Buddha
- What is the definition of cell specialization
- Which oil is in the oil change
- Why is Cambodia called Kampuchea
- Why do we use virtualization
- Why do I make big shit
- How does a mini computer work
- A 15 credit score is good
- What popular songs came from dreams
- How should you invest in the short term
- How would your closest friend describe you
- How is Raman classes in Roorkee
- Why is mastitis important
- Hayden Christensen is a good actor
- What is natting on the network
- Why is Babe Ruth important
- Why is rapport important in business
- Is the name of HIM Pusa enough